Technique is about duplication and scale. Innovation is about novel, serendipitous connections.
But 'technique' can also be about careful listening, or mutual acceptance of set of conditions for conducting an experiment.
And 'connections' can just as well turn out politicization, as anyone who has ever observed a school cafeteria can attest to.
I'm leaning more towards an anthropological/sociological definition of clairvoyance. Where technique and connections alike are part of the Zeitgeist and innovations are little hits that have the potential, though not the implicit right, to create new rhythms.